Skip to content

Search for:

About
PERITIA Outputs
Trust Hub
Trustworthiness Toolkit
Highlights
Partners
Contact Us

About
PERITIA Research
Youth on Trust Essay Collection
Trust Hub
Trustworthiness Toolkit
Project Highlights
Events
PERITIA Newsletter
Partners
Team
Contact Us

Search for:

How are you going to decide who is an expert in a particular field?

Should we trust Jordan Perterson on matters of environmental science?

Other examples

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870883. The information and opinions on this website and other communications materials are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Commission.

© 2023 PERITIA | Privacy Policy | Legal notice | Powered by Scienseed

Sorry, that wasn’t the right answer

Jordan Peterson has repeatedly criticised the reliance of climate science on models, as well as called the scientific evidence of extreme weather patterns as dubious. However, he doesn’t have any expertise on matters of climate, climate models, and environmental science. He is a psychologist and popular writer, who uses his social influence to debate topics outside his field of expertise .

Do you want to know more?

An expert should have training in their field of expertise. Can you find that training listed in their CV or somewhere else that is publicly available? Do they attend meetings and conferences and interact with their peers at these events? Do they have a good track record of experience in their field? Do other scientists refer to their work?

Here are some points that you should consider when you’re trying to determine who is a genuine expert in a particular field.

Does the expert have proof of their qualifications, like university degrees or professional achievements? Be careful of experts who exploit their high profile in one area of expertise to make recommendations on issues clearly unconnected to their field. This is called epistemic trespassing. ^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}
Recognition from peers is a crucial indicator of expertise. Do other experts in their shared field refer to them or the impact they’ve made? Is there evidence that they engage with other experts? ⁷
Experts who advise on policy should show awareness and sensitivity of the broader impacts of their advice. Is the expert willing to engage with the public on these issues? 8, 9

Additional resources

What’s wrong with epistemic trespassing?
Epistemic trespassing and expert witness testimony
Epistemic neighbors: trespassing and the range of expert authority
Twitter thread by Nathan Ballantyne on epistemic trespassing.
Epistemic Trespassing
What is pseudoscience? Scientific American
Reputation: what it is and why it matters
Defending Longino’s Social Epistemology
The Legitimacy of Pseudo-Expert Discourse in the Public Sphere

Well done – you were right!

Jordan Peterson has repeatedly criticised the reliance of climate science on models, as well as called the scientific evidence of extreme weather patterns as dubious. However, he doesn’t have any expertise on matters of climate, climate models, and environmental science. He is a psychologist and popular writer, who uses his social influence to debate topics outside his field of expertise .

Do you want to know more?

An expert should have training in their field of expertise. Can you find that training listed in their CV or somewhere else that is publicly available? Do they attend meetings and conferences and interact with their peers at these events? Do they have a good track record of experience in their field? Do other scientists refer to their work?

Here are some points that you should consider when you’re trying to determine who is a genuine expert in a particular field.

Does the expert have proof of their qualifications, like university degrees or professional achievements? Be careful of experts who exploit their high profile in one area of expertise to make recommendations on issues clearly unconnected to their field. This is called epistemic trespassing. ^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}
Recognition from peers is a crucial indicator of expertise. Do other experts in their shared field refer to them or the impact they’ve made? Is there evidence that they engage with other experts? ⁷
Experts who advise on policy should show awareness and sensitivity of the broader impacts of their advice. Is the expert willing to engage with the public on these issues? 8, 9

Additional resources

What’s wrong with epistemic trespassing?
Epistemic trespassing and expert witness testimony
Epistemic neighbors: trespassing and the range of expert authority
Twitter thread by Nathan Ballantyne on epistemic trespassing.
Epistemic Trespassing
What is pseudoscience? Scientific American
Reputation: what it is and why it matters
Defending Longino’s Social Epistemology
The Legitimacy of Pseudo-Expert Discourse in the Public Sphere

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in .

Powered by GDPR Cookie Compliance

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Enable or Disable Cookies

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.