BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-// - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://peritia-trust.eu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for 
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20240909T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20240911T130000
DTSTAMP:20260414T230310
CREATED:20240821T152725Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240826T140518Z
UID:7690-1725868800-1726059600@peritia-trust.eu
SUMMARY:A conference on Science and Democracy
DESCRIPTION:PERITIA Network of Research on Trust and Expertise\, UCD  \n& \nSciDem: University of Oslo Research Project on Science and Democracy \n  \nA conference on   \nScience and Democracy  \n  \nProgramme  \n  \nMonday September 9 \nNewman House (MoLI) \n 86 St Stephen’s Green\, Dublin 2 \n  \nRegistration (free but essential) \n  \n  \n9.30-10.00 Registration\, tea/coffee \n  \n10.00 – 10.30 Organisers’ Welcome and Introductions  \nMaria Baghramian (UCD) \nCathrine Holst (University of Oslo) \nSilvia Ivani (UCD) \n  \n10.30-12.00 – Parallel Session 1 \n10.30-11.10 Science\, Bad Beliefs\, and Network Vulnerability\nSergiu Spatan (Dresden University of Technology) \n11.10-11.50 Democratic Governance as Risk Management for Big Science Collaborations\nSaakshi Dulani (Johns Hopkins University)  Vitaly Pronskikh (University of Pittsburgh)  & Helene Sorgner (University of Klagenfurt) \n11.50-12.30 How the Attempt to Cleanse Public Discourse of Misinformation Undermines Science and Rational Inquiry\nDavid Thunder (University of Navarra Pamplona) \n  \n10.30-12.30 – Parallel Session 2 \n10.30-11.10  Authority and responsibility: the case of novel research\nMason Majszak (University of Bern)  & Federica Bocchi (University of Copenhagen) \n11.10- 12.00 Modelling Scientists and Public Interactions\nFilippo Riscica Lizzio (University of Bologna) \n  \n12.30-2.00 Lunch break \n  \n14.00-16.00 – Parallel Session 4 \n14.00-14.40 Patient involvement as Epistocracy\nBen Davies (University of Sheffield) \n14.40-15.20 Expert Testimony and Moral Encroachment in Vaccine Hesitancy.\nCarline Klijnman (UCD) \n  \n14.00 -1600 – Parallel Session 3 (Graduate panel I) \n14.00-14.40 Public Reason\, Values in Science\, and Democracy\nJesse Hamilton ( University of Pennsylvania & LSE)\n14.40-15.20 Challenges to Cultivating Communicative Rationality: An Inner Critique of Habermasian Discourse Theory and the Role of Scientific Expertise in Democratic Governance \nAntonio Pio De Mattia (UCD) \n15.20-16.00 Technocratic Elements in Democracy: Unelected\, Unaccountable and Illegitimate?\nLucas Dijker (UCD) \n  \n4.00-4.30 Coffee Break \n  \n4.30 – 5.30 – Invited Session 1  \nScience and Democracy:  Defining responsible research in a political world \nHeather Douglas (Michigan State University) \n  \nChair: Luke Drury (RIA and DIAS) \n  \n7.00 Conference Dinner \n  \n  \nTuesday September 10 \nNewman House (MoLI) \n 86 St Stephen’s Green\, Dublin 2 \n  \n  \n10.00- 12.00 – Parallel Session 5                         \n10.00-10.40 Normalizing Uncertainty: on science communication in times of peace and the reversibility of democratic decisions\nFabio Paglieri (Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies\, CNR Rome) \n10.40- 11.20 No Academia without Democracy? Reflections from Israel\nShaul Katzir (Tel Aviv University) \n11.20-12.00 A Critical (Re-)Assessment Of Institutional Epistemic Humility: Lessons From a Pandemic Crisis \nMelanie Altanian (University of Freiburg) & Silvia Ivani (UCD) \n  \n10.00-12.00 – Parallel Session 6 (Graduate Panel II) \n10.00-10.40 Science\, Expertise\, and Technocratic Domination: A Case for Democratic Supervision\nRory Kent (King’s College\, University of Cambridge) \n10.40-11.20 Transparency and Public Trust in Science \nEmily Scholfield (Johns Hopkins University) \n11.20-12.00 Quality of Life and Public Policy – Well-being and Political Decision-making\nPaal Fredrik Skjørten Kvarberg (University of Oslo) \n  \n12.00 -14.00 Lunch Break \n  \n14.00- 16.00 – Parallel Session 7  \n14.00-14.40. Mistrust of Science: as a Failure of Collective Decision-Making\nGabriele Contessa (Carleton University\, Ottawa\, Canada) \n14.40-15.20. Value Divergence and Democratic Science\nMichael Pope (Harvard University\,  Embedded EthiCS pProgram) \n15.20-16.00 Scientific Recommendations in Times of Crisis\nMikkel Gerken (University of Southern Denmark & Inland Norway University) \n  \n14.00-16.00- Parallel Session 8  \n14..00-14.40  Democracy and Climate Crisis\nAlexa Zellentin (UCD) \n14.40-15.20 The Supranational Institutionalisation of Legislative Science Advice: What Role for The European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change? \nHelena Seibicke (University of Oslo) \n15.20-16.00 Do scientists deliberate? The role of collective deliberation in scientific collaboration and justification\nVasiliki Xiromeriti  (Jean Moulin Lyon 3 University) \n  \nCoffee break 16.00-16.30 \n  \n16.30-17.30 – Invited Session 2  \nCollectivizing Expert Testimony \nFinnur Ulf Dellsén (University of Iceland) \nChair: Maria Baghramian (UCD and University of Oslo) \n  \n17.30-19.00 Address by Prof Orla Feely\, President of UCD\, followed by a reception \n  \n  \nWednesday. September 11 \nRoyal Irish Academy \n19 Dawson Street\, Dublin 2 \n  \n9.00-11.00 – Invited Panel: Science\, Policy\, and Democracy \n9.00-9.40 Cathrine Holst (University of Oslo): Democratization of Expertise: the epistemic track \n9.40-10.20 Daniel Kaiser (ALLEA\, Berlin): Science Advice and Policy: The role of the Academies \n10.20-1100 Joseph Lacey (UCD): Political Advocacy and Democratic Spectatorship – Four Postures for Winning and Maintaining Political Support \n  \n11.00-11.30 Coffee Break \n  \n11.30-12.30 – Invited Session 3 \nScience\, Democracy\, and the Public: Constructive critique vs. collateral damage \nStephan Lewandowsky (University of Bristol) \nChair: Jane Suiter (DCU) \n  \n  \n  \n  \n 
URL:https://peritia-trust.eu/single-event/a-conference-on-science-and-democracy/
LOCATION:Newman House\, UCD\, 86 St. Stephen's Green\, Dublin\, Ireland
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20240909T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20240911T130000
DTSTAMP:20260414T230310
CREATED:20241126T111936Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241126T111936Z
UID:7721-1725868800-1726059600@peritia-trust.eu
SUMMARY:Wittgenstein\, Newman\, and Hinge Epistemology
DESCRIPTION:Register now \nThe conference\, organised jointly by UCD Newman Center for the Study of Religions and the PERITIA Nework of Resech on Trust and Expertise\, explores the connections between the area of research in epistemology known as “hinge epistemology”\, inspired by the last writings of Ludwig Wittgenstein\, and the views of philosopher and theologian St. John Henry Newman (1801-90)\, with a view to developing new insights both into hinge epistemology and Newman studies. \nWittgenstein\, Newman\, and Hinge Epistemology\nMonday 9th and Tuesday 10th December 2024.\nNewman House (Museum of Literature Ireland). 86 St. Stephen’s Green\, Dublin.\nA hybrid conference. Zoom links will be sent to registered participants.\nOrganisers: Prof. Maria Baghramian (UCD) and Assoc. Prof. Daniel Esmonde Deasy (UCD). \nProgramme\nDay 1: Monday 9 December \n9.00-9.20 Registration and Welcome. \n9.20-11.20 Parallel Session 1 (Old Physics Theatre): \n9.20-10.00 Yoen Qian-Laurent (Sorbonne Université): ‘Newman and Wittgenstein: A Pascalian Genealogy’. \n10.00-10.40 Twan Stiekel (Humboldt-Universität Berlin): ‘Hinge-Epistemology and the Universality of Empirical Knowledge’. \n10.40-11.20 Eliora Henzler (University of Oxford): ‘Accordion Muscles—The ‘Hinge-Certainties’ View of Delusions on Collective Responsibility for Beliefs’. \n9.20-11.20 Parallel Session 2 (The Salon): \n9.20-10.00 ONLINE: Mohammadhadi Soleimani & Davood Hosseini (Tarbiat Modares University\, Tehran\, Iran): ‘Wright on Hinge Propositions; Resolving a Problem’. \n10.00-10.40 Joshua Maffuccio (UC Irvine): ‘ Newman and Hinges: Nature’s Primacy\, Reason’s Personality\, and Certainty’s Versatility’. \n10.40-11.20 Louise Gordon (St. Patrick’s University\, Maynooth): ‘Could Mathematics be a Hinge Commitment for John Henry Newman?’. \n11.20-11.40 Coffee Break \n11.40-13.00 Invited Speaker 1 (Old Physics Theatre): \nAnnalisa Coliva (UC Irvine)\, ‘Religious Hinges?’. \n13.00-14.20 Lunch break. \n14.20-16.20 Parallel Session 3 (Old Physics Theatre): \n14.20-15.00 Paweł Grad (University of Warsaw): ‘Hidden Grounds: On the Rational Profile of Religious Hinges’. \n15.00-15.40 ONLINE: Yang Zhouwanyue Nata (LMU München): ‘Hinge Epistemology of Mathematical Understanding’. \n15.40 -16.20 ONLINE: Russell Ming (UC Irvine): ‘Conciliationism & Hinge Epistemology’. \n14.20-16.20 Parallel Session 4 (The Salon): \n14.20-15.00 Susan Lucas (Team Rector\, Parish of East Ham): ‘The Hinges of Doctrine: How the Door Turns: Wittgenstein\, Newman\, Lindbeck\, and the Contested Doctrine of Marriage in the Church of England’. \n15.00-15.40 ONLINE: Joe Milburn & Thomas Marré (University of Navarra): ‘Virtuous Hinge Epistemology: Or Why Hinge Epistemologists Need Epistemic Prudence’ \n15.40-16.20 ONLINE: Christian Emrich (Fordham University): ‘Defending Newman’s Quasi-Fideism’. \n16.20-16.40 Coffee Break. \n16.40-18.00 Invited Speaker 2 (Old Physics Theatre): \nGenia Schönbaumsfeld (University of Southampton): ‘Passionate Commitment to a System of Reference’. \n19.30 Conference Dinner. \n  \nDay 2: Tuesday 10 December \n9.20-10.40 Invited Speaker 3 (Old Physics Theatre): \nONLINE: Duncan Pritchard (UC Irvine): ‘Quasi-Fideism and Virtuous Anti-Evidentialism: Wittgenstein and Newman’. \n10.40-11.00 Coffee break. \n11.00-13.00 Parallel Session 5 (Old Physics Theatre): \n11.00-11.40 ONLINE: Jackson Hawkins (Brigham Young University): ‘Towards a Wittgensteinian ‘Hinge Ethics’: A Hinge Epistemological Approach to Absolute Value in Wittgenstein’. \n11.40-12.20 Nicola Chadwick: ‘A Tale of Two Hinges: Propositional and Doxastic Hinge Commitments in Duncan Pritchard’s Non-Belief Hinge Epistemology’. \n12.20-13.00. Matthias Statzkowski (Humboldt-Universität): ‘’Two problems with the transcendental interpretation of epistemic hinges in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty’. \n11.00-13.00 Parallel Session 6 (The Salon): \n11.00-12.00 Christopher Oldfield (University of Cambridge): ‘Thinking with Assent while Living with Doubts: Question\, Doubts and Modes of Holding Propositions’. \n12.00-13.00 Angelo Bottone (University College Dublin): ‘Wittgenstein’s Copy of The Grammar of Assent: A New Insight into His Engagement with Newman’. \n13.00-14.20 Lunch break. \n14.20-16.00 Parallel Session 7 (Old Physics Theatre): \n14.20-15.00 Rajeev Dutta (UC Irvine): ‘Are Delusions Hinges?’. \n15.00-15.40 ONLINE: Qihe Sun Damon (UC Irvine): ‘Does Crispin Wright’s Hinge Epistemology imply that Skepticism is Rationally Unsustainable?’ \n15.40-16.20 ONLINE: Joanna Lawson (Oklahoma State University): ‘Hinge Commitments as Core Normative Concepts’. \n14.20-16.20 Parallel Session 8 (The Salon): \n14.20-15.00 Modesto Gómez Alonso (University of Seville): ‘Unconditional Assent for Hinge Epistemologists’. \n15.00-15.40 Jakob Ohlhorst (VU Amsterdam): ‘Newman\, Fundamentalism\, and the Moral Problem of Demarcation’. \n15.40-16.20 ONLINE: Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast (Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt\, Germany): ‘What Can John Henry Newman Teach to the Hinge Epistemologists?’. \n16.20-16.40 Coffee Break. \n16.40-18.00 Invited Speaker 4 (Old Physics Theatre): \nCrispin Wright (University of Stirling): ‘What are epistemic ‘Hinges’ and what might a ‘hinge epistemology’ be?’. \n18.00 Close of the conference. \n\n\n\n\n\n  \n  \n  \n 
URL:https://peritia-trust.eu/single-event/wittgenstein-newman-and-hinge-epistemology/
LOCATION:Newman House\, UCD\, 86 St. Stephen's Green\, Dublin\, Ireland
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR